komplexify!

06.13.2010

Quickies

Attention all idiots with babies:

The movie theater is not a daycare center.

That is all.

As you might have guessed, we went to the movies the other day, where we saw the new, Jackie-Chain-infused Karate Kid.  With its emphasis on Chinese culture and locales, should have more appropriately be renamed the Kung Fu Kid, but I digress.  One of the first trailers before the movie started was for The Last Airbender, which despite still being helmed by M. Night Shamadingdong still appears to KICK. ASS.

The Ladybug is similarly excited about the movie, and in fact went so far as to design her own movie poster for it:

In case you’re missing some of the subtle details, the Ladybug offers this explanation:

Speaking of the Karate Kid, which by the way was awesome itself, I just about died watching Jackie Chan Hates Karate Kids.

Last Sunday, the Ladybug, Queen B, and I went on the annual Crazy Horse Volksmarch, which I apparently only undertake on even-numbered years.  Its a 10K hike (that’s 6.2 miles for the metric-impaired) that goes up to the face of the ever-imcomplete Crazy Horse Monument.  Early on, we passed another family, where I overheard the following:

Brother: Ugh, this is tiring.

Sister: We only just started.  We’re not even a mile in.

Brother: I wish I was a bird, so I could fly to the end.

Sister: With your luck, you’d end up a penguin and still have to walk.

Brother: [Stops]

Brother: You just broke my dream.

On June 3, torrential rain caused a massive, 66-foot-diameter sinkhole to form in the middle of Guatemala City, devouring a 3-story building in the process.  As yet, scientists do not know what caused it, although I have a theory.

06.1.2010

Transformvesty 2: Revenge of Michael Bay

I’m going to do you all a favor, and excise from the one-hundred fifty minute long soul-suck that is Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen the only worthwhile scene. In it, the protagonists have located an ancient Transformer, one who has been on Earth since before the Great Pyramids were built.  Quoth he:

You’re welcome.

Really, you ought to just walk away right now, because if you add any more details to this movie, you’ll realize just how terrible this movie is.  Hell, just look at the title: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.  Just think about that for a moment, and it’s clear this movie is a joke:

Michael Bay was trying to make Transformers 2 an epic, but ending up with just EPIC FAIL.  Just take every bad thing about the first Transformers movie (and if you need a reminder on what those are, here you go),  increase it by an order of magnitude, and you’ve got the sequel.

For example,the first movie was dumb.  I don’t mean this in the sense of being of poor quality or inferior (although it was certainly these things too); rather, absolutely none of it made any sense to anyone with more than one synapse to fire.  This time its even worse.  For example, the movie opens by stating that the Autobots and the U.S. Army having teamed up to covertly assassinate Decepticons remaining on Earth, whereby “covertly” Michael Bay apparently means “100-foot-tall robots level the living shit out of downtown Shaghai in the middle of rush hour.”  Then an Obama administration official, slightly miffed by this, tries to deport them from the planet because they don’t have green cards.

Eventually it becomes clear that the real plot of Transformers 2 involves a transforming MacGuffin with the potential to empower Decepticons to destroy the Earth.  It also has the power to magically teleport humans to Robot Heaven.  Plus, it’s magic, and it only works if you really really believe in it, kind of like Tinker Bell.

I’m serious.  This movie is that dumb.

For another example, in the first movie, the robots (despite looking cool) are invariably repulsive, one-dimensional caricatures.  The same is true here.  The aformentioned ancient Transformer, to take an example,  is more or less summed up as CRANKY OLD GUY.  We know he’s old, because when he transforms, his robot form includes an effing walker.  Also, he’s incontinent, and occasionally shits himself.

I’m still serious.  This movie is that classy.

(This is in fact the most classy example in the movie, too, in that the robot only shits out parachutes.  The other robots in the movie cry, bleed, and even vomit various coolants and fluids on their foes.  Combine that with robot urination from the first movie and I’d say Michael Bay has a really creepy fascination with watersports.)

It’s actually worse than that.  Whereas the first movie only hinted at a Transformer’s mechanized manhood, this movie is chock full of cybernetic shlongs.  There’s a blender that transforms into a foot-tall robot with a foot-long cock that shoots lasers.  There’s another foot-tall robo-perv that humps legs like a horny chihuahua.  There’s a robot that transforms into a supermodel (seriously) who makes out with Shia LaBeouf using her two-foot-long tongue and (literal) buns of steel.  We even get an uncomfortable look at the underside of giant robot scrotum as its freeballin’ two-ton nads dangle (and clank) in the wind.

I’m still serious.  Michael Bay is one sick puppy.

As if gratuitous robot alien gonzo porn wasn’t enough, Transformers 2 boasts as protagonists the most irritating, blatantly racist CGI caricatures since Jar Jar Binks, the Autobot twins.  They’re robotic wanna-G’s that spend the entire movie saying things like “Git ready for a ass-whuppin’” and “‘Cuz you a pussy, that’s why” and “I’ma bust a cap in yo ass” before finally having to admit that they’re both illiterate.  Also, they have nappy robo-hair, ginormous robo-ears, and one of them sports a gold (buck) tooth:

I think their names are supposed to be Mudflap and Skidmark, but “Amos and Android” would have been far more appropriate.

I could go on about this, but other sites have done it much better, such as the Editing Room or Topless Robot.  Let me simply sum it up by saying that (1) Michael Bay is one racist, sick puppy, and (2) Transformers 2 is a monotonous unfunny joke.

Filed under: Reel life

03.6.2010

Movie review: Alice in Wonderland

I just saw Tim Burton’s new Alice in Wonderland movie.  It’s hard to say if it’s a sequel to the books or a re-imagining of the whole thing.  In it, a young girl is accidentally transported from her humdrum everyday world to a fantasy land where she is recruited by one queen to vanquish another.  In doing so, she is escorted by a crazed, hat-wearing Johnny Depp, who offers her an odd assortment of shape-shifting snacks, as well as introducing her to an odd assortment of small identical people and various sentient animals.  Finally, the hero must locate an ancient sword and do epic CGI battle with a winged wraith and finally vanish an evil, big-eyed (and, in this case, equally big-headed) evil.

So, to sum up:

This isn’t to say that the movie is bad, necessarily… it’s just nothing new.  Burton’s Wonderland isn’t particularly wondrous at all; in fact, it looks a lot like the worlds of The Nightmare Before Christmas and Corpse Bride and Sleepy Hollow, and if nothing else suggests an obssessive-compulsive fascination with spiral-shaped trees.  In fact, Burton doesn’t even call it Wonderland… in the movie, it’s known as Underland.

Most of the mathematical wit and logical nonsense that characterized Lewis Carroll’s original two stories (Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass (and What Alice Found There) has been ejected in favor of a (rather sadly) pedestrian action movie in which Alice must prove that she’s not bound by rules and Victorian destiny by doing battle with an anemic dragon and a hydrocephalic queen… which paradoxically is precisely what everyone in Underland says she’s destined to do.

That being said, the movie moves at a good clip, so it’s never particularly boring. Burton’s twin muses of Johnny Depp and Helena Bodham Carter are entertaining even underneath all the make-up and digital manipulation, and Depp’s celebratory dance at the end of the movie is amusing as hell.  It’s certainly a nifty popcorn-fodder movie, but regrettably nothing more.

Filed under: Reel life

03.3.2010

Movie review: Next

The movie Next has been on TV a lot lately.  To say it’s a bit repetitive might be an understatement.  Here’s the movie summarized in psuedocode.

movie NEXT ()
{
  set audience-satisfaction = 0;
  set plot-points-resolved = 0;
  set creepy_factor = 0;

  do while (creepy_factor < 2) {
    for (i = 1 to 100) {
       show << the mall-escape sequence from
               the movie "Minority Report";
    }
    audience_satisfaction ++;
    plot_points_resolved ++;
    show << creepy scene with 40-something Nic Cage in bed
            with 20-something Jessica Biehl;
    creepy_factor ++;
  }

  show << previous movie events invalidated
          as an extended dream sequence;
  plot_points_resolved --;
  audience_satisfaction = 0;
  return 0;
}
Filed under: Math musings, Reel life

01.9.2010

Cinemathics

Of course we didn’t watch Alvin and the Chipmunks 2 last week. We instead made it through some of our Netflix queue instead.

Paranormal Activity

Paranormal Activity is about a haunting in a typical suburban home, whose paranormal activities seemed to be targeted towards a girl; in an effort to document it, they decide to record the increasingly spooky supernatural circumstances themselves with video. So, essentially,

Paranormal activity = Poltergeist + Blair Witch + a tripod

I don’t know how spooky this would have been in a ginormous, state-of-the-art stadium-seating uber-theater, but this movie about the ghostly goings-on in a suburban home is perfectly suited for viewing at midnight in the basement of your own suburban home.  In many ways Paranormal Activity is what the Blair Witch Project was shooting for — an uncomfortably first-person narrative with its scares grounded in “reality,” fueled not by the horrible things you do see but by the horrible things you imagine happening in the places you can’t see — without all the nauseas-inducing jerky camera work.

The Queen B and I found ourselves hooked after the first “event,” and jumped appropriately as the haunting became progressively worse, all the way up through the movie’s scary and unexpectedly violent climax.  In fact, my only gripe with the movie is its very last second.  (Spoiler alert!)  Why did they feel the need to cheapen the movie at the very last moment with Katie’s crappy CGI spooky face?  Wouldn’t it have been just better to let her crawl back in bed as if nothing happened, after which having the camera mysteriously cuts out?  Ah well.

Knowing

A distressed widower discovers a supernatural means to predict upcoming disasters, although this doesn’t necessarily mean an ability to stop them; however, as the situation becomes more dire and his family becomes more threatened by a shadowy collection of other-worldy figures, the supernatural events lead him to regain is lost faith in a higher meaning of the universe.  So, in a nutshell,

Knowing = Mothman Prophecies + Signs + an EBM band

I always like the movie’s directed by Alex Proya (think The Crow, or Dark City), and Knowing is no different.  It’s certainly not as moody or cerebral as those other two movies, but it moves at a good pace and maintains a moody of general uneasiness, occasionally punctuated by top-notch action sequences.  (The crash landing of the plane is an excellent example — it’s possibly my second favorite single-take cluster-f*ck action sequence, trailing the forest-ambush-sequence in Children of Men.)  And you’ve got to be impressed with a movie that ends with the hero complete unable to prevent the cataclysmic, fiery death of every living person on the entire planet, save two.  Spoiler alert, by the way.

As a side note, it also features what might be the funniest bit of dialogue concerning the modern scientific method, which goes something like this.

Scientist 1: Hey, you remember that girl I tried to hook you up with?  Ph double-Ds?

Scientist 2: Is it even ethical to talk about your sister-in-law like that?

Scientist 1: What?  It’s been independently verified and peer reviewed.

Star Trek

In the new Star Trek reboot, a ragtag team of rebels (including the disreputable hunky one, the young one verses in an ancient alien tradition, and a hot chick) team up to stop a group of intergalactic baddies who, armed with a massive spacecraft capable of blowing up entire planets… particularly those populated by peaceful peoples. That is,

Star Trek = Star Wars + miniskirts

It’s clearly not your father’s Star Trek: Kirk and Spock hate each others’ guts, the planet Vulcan gets obliterated halfway through it, Starfleet officers are trained to shoot first and pontificate on the issues of freedom and equality later, Spock’s mom is Winona Ryder, and so forth.  That being said it’s still a fun popcorn flick, and it’s peppered with a couple of nods to old-school Trek fans, including a  gleefully nasty fate for the red-uniformed dude on the away team, or the fact that Leonard Nimoy actually appears as the Spock from the original — i.e. your father’s! — Star Trek universe.

Fermat’s Room

In the Spanish movie Fermat’s Room, four mathematicians (well, three mathematicians and an engineer) are invited to a secret meeting to discuss the “greatest enigma of all time.” Instead, they find themselves stuck taking an IQ test in a room tht starts to shrink when the questions aren’t answered quickly enough.  That is,
Fermat's Room = (SATs) intersect (Trash compactor)
The movie does a decent job generating tension by combining the twin fears of claustrophobia and word problems, although it’s primary mystery — who arranged for the four to meet in the slow death trap, and why — is a little hokey.  That being said, any movie in which a proposed proof of the Goldbach Conjecture plays a fundamental plot point is definitely worth taking a look at.

It also offers this final bit of advice, which coming from a foreign movie I found altogether more amusing:

Engineer: Pressure is unpredicatble.  It can turn coal into dust or a diamond.

Mathematician: Was that Archimedes?

Engineer: No.  MacGuyver.

Filed under: Math musings, Reel life
Older Posts »